4.4 Article

An invasive intertidal reef-forming polychaete affect habitat use and feeding behavior of migratory and locals birds in a SW Atlantic coastal lagoon

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY
Volume 375, Issue 1-2, Pages 76-83

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.05.008

Keywords

Feeding behaviour; Habitat use; Invasive species; Polychaete; Shorebirds

Funding

  1. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
  2. CONICET (Argentina) [PIP 5669]
  3. ANPCyT (Argentina) [PICT-13527]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of our research was to evaluate by sampling and field experiments the effects of the invasive intertidal reef-building polychaete Ficopomatus enigmaticus on the habitat use and foraging behavior of birds in Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon (37 degrees 40'S, 57 degrees 23'W, Argentina). Nearby areas with and without reefs were selected to asses their use by birds. Focal observations during low tide showed that bird densities (migratory shorebirds = Tringa melanoluca, T. flavipes, Calidris fuscicollis; non-migratory birds = Phalacrocorax olivaceus, Larus dominicanus, L. maculipennis, Anas spp., Vanellus chilensis, Milvago chimango) were higher on reef surface compared with similar areas without reefs. Migratory shorebirds used reefs surface mainly for feeding, while local birds used it for resting. Foraging rates of T. melanoleuca and T. flavipes were higher on the reefs than in the bare sediment. Comparative sampling (10 core per site) showed that epifaunal organisms (amphipod Melita palmata, crab Cyrtograpsus angulatus and gastropod Heleobia spp.) were more abundant on reef surfaces, but the density of infaunal preys (the polychaetes Laeonereis acuta, Nepthys fluviatilis, and Neanthes succinea) were not different between areas. Bird exclosure experiment and control (n = 10) showed no differences in density and size distribution between treatments for any benthic species analyzed. In conclusion, there was a positive effect of F enigmaticus reefs on the habitat use of birds, because this area was preferred for feeding and resting, and there were more epifaunal preys which positively affected the foraging rates of shorebirds. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available