4.4 Article

Animal-sediment relationships re-visited: Characterising species' distributions along an environmental gradient using canonical analysis and quantile regression splines

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY
Volume 366, Issue 1-2, Pages 16-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.07.006

Keywords

Canonical analysis of principal coordinates; Predictive models; Quantile regression splines; Sediment texture; Soft-sediment assemblages; Species-environment relationships

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Benthic soft-sediment organisms generally show strong relationships with the grain-size characteristics of the sediments they inhabit. These relationships, when characterised from field data, tend to be asymmetrical, non-linear and heteroscedastic, due to the existence of multiple other potentially important and interacting factors, some of which are inevitably unmeasured. For multivariate data, canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) can be used to isolate particular gradients of interest, despite the presence of other potentially important factors. For univariate abundance data, models focusing on upper quantiles of species' distributions can ameliorate the problem of heterogeneity induced by other variables. Here, a multivariate model of the relationship between benthic inter-tidal estuarine soft-sediment assemblages (sampled over a period of 3 years from 70 sites across the Auckland region) and the percentage of mud in the sediments was generated using CAP. To characterise changes in assemblage structure, quantile regression splines (of the 0.95 quantile) were used to model each of the twenty most abundant individual taxa along the gradient in percentage mud. This approach provided an effective instrumental quantitative predictive model of species' turnover, while allowing for the asymmetric, non-linear animal-sediment relationships and heterogeneous scatter observed in species' abundances along the mud gradient. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available