4.7 Article

miR168 influences phase transition, leaf epinasty, and fruit development via SlAGO1s in tomato

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 65, Issue 22, Pages 6655-6666

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru387

Keywords

ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1); developmental transition; fruit abnormality; leaf epinasty; miR168; RNA-induced RNA silencing complex (RISC); tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

Categories

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Programme of China [2012AA101702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30972002, 31071798]
  3. Committee of Science and Technology of Chongqing [2011BA1024]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M521679]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Arabidopsis thaliana, ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1) interacts with miR168 to modulate the small RNA regulatory pathway. However, the underlying mechanism of regulation and relationship between AGO1 and miR168 is poorly understood in the cash crop Solanum lycopersicum (tomato). We previously found that SlAGO1A and SlAGO1B were cleaved by miR168 in tomato. In this study, we show that SlAGO1A and SlAGO1B accumulate in miR168-sponge transgenic plants, and that expression of miR168-resistant SlAGO1A (4m-SlAGO1A) and SlAGO1B (4m-SlAGO1B) in tomato results in a series of defects affecting growth rate, floral timing, leaves, and fruit. Accumulation of miR156 was found when 4m-SlAGO1A was at an early developmental stage compared to the wild type and original SlAGO1A transgenic plants, and miR172 was highly expressed in adult 4m-SlAGO1A compared to the controls. In addition, the expression of multiple small RNAs was altered in 4m-SlAGO1A. Taken together, our data provide novel insights into the interaction between SlAGO1s and miR168 in determining growth rate, phase change, leaf epinasty, fruit initiation and expansion, and other developmental processes in tomato.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available