4.7 Article

Importance of leaf anatomy in determining mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2 across species: quantitative limitations and scaling up by models

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 64, Issue 8, Pages 2269-2281

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert086

Keywords

cell wall thickness; diffusion model; leaf anatomy; leaf structure; photosynthesis; quantitative photosynthetic limitations

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [AGL2008-04525-C02-01, BFU2008-01072, BFU2011-23294]
  2. CSIC
  3. Estonian Ministry of Science and Education [IUT8-3]
  4. European Commission through European Regional Fund (the Estonian Center of Excellence in Environmental Adaptation)
  5. European Social Fund programme Mobilitas [MJD122]
  6. Estonian Academy of Sciences [2009EN0005]
  7. CSIC [2009EN0005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Foliage photosynthetic and structural traits were studied in 15 species with a wide range of foliage anatomies to gain insight into the importance of key anatomical traits in the limitation of diffusion of CO2 from substomatal cavities to chloroplasts. The relative importance of different anatomical traits in constraining CO2 diffusion was evaluated using a quantitative model. Mesophyll conductance (g(m)) was most strongly correlated with chloroplast exposed surface to leaf area ratio (S-c/S) and cell wall thickness (T-cw), but, depending on foliage structure, the overall importance of g(m) in constraining photosynthesis and the importance of different anatomical traits in the restriction of CO2 diffusion varied. In species with mesophytic leaves, membrane permeabilities and cytosol and stromal conductance dominated the variation in g(m). However, in species with sclerophytic leaves, g(m) was mostly limited by T-cw. These results demonstrate the major role of anatomy in constraining mesophyll diffusion conductance and, consequently, in determining the variability in photosynthetic capacity among species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available