4.7 Article

Deposition of ammonium and nitrate in the roots of maize seedlings supplied with different nitrogen salts

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages 1997-2006

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err410

Keywords

ammonium; nitrate; osmolarity; root apex; tissue storage; xylem sap

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-08-18435]
  2. US Department of Agriculture [2008-01029]
  3. Kearney Foundation of Soil Science [2008.016]
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0818435] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study measured total osmolarity and concentrations of NH4+, NO3-, K+, soluble carbohydrates, and organic acids in maize seminal roots as a function of distance from the apex, and NH4+ and NO3- in xylem sap for plants receiving NH4+ or NO3- as a sole N-source, NH4+ plus NO3-, or no nitrogen at all. The disparity between net deposition rates and net exogenous influx of NH4+ indicated that growing cells imported NH4+ from more mature tissue, whereas more mature root tissues assimilated or translocated a portion of the NH4+ absorbed. Net root NO3- influx under Ca(NO3)(2) nutrition was adequate to account for pools found in the growth zone and provided twice as much as was deposited locally throughout the non-growing tissue. In contrast, net root NO3- influx under NH4NO3 was less than the local deposition rate in the growth zone, indicating that additional NO3- was imported or metabolically produced. The profile of NO3- deposition rate in the growth zone, however, was similar for the plants receiving Ca(NO3)(2) or NH4NO3. These results suggest that NO3- may serve a major role as an osmoticant for supporting root elongation in the basal part of the growth zone and maintaining root function in the young mature tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available