4.7 Article

Dynamic imaging of glucose flux impedance using FRET sensors in wild-type Arabidopsis plants

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 62, Issue 7, Pages 2411-2417

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq444

Keywords

Energy transfer; fluorescence resonance; flux; glucose; nanosensor; root tip

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-04ER15542]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-04ER15542] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative and dynamic analysis of metabolites and signalling molecules is limited by technical challenges in obtaining temporally resolved information at the cellular and compartmental level. Real-time information on signalling and metabolite levels with subcellular granularity can be obtained with the help of genetically encoded FRET (Forster resonance energy transfer) nanosensors. FRET nanosensors represent powerful tools for gene discovery, and analysis of regulatory networks, for example by screening mutants. However, RNA silencing has impaired our ability to express FRET nanosensors functionally in Arabidopsis plants. This drawback was overcome here by expressing the nanosensors in RNA silencing mutants. However, the use of silencing mutants requires the generation of homozygous lines deficient in RNA silencing as well as the mutation of interest and co-expression of the nanosensor. Here it is shown that dynamic changes in cytosolic glucose levels can readily be quantified in wild-type Arabidopsis plants at early stages of development (7-15 d) before silencing had a major effect on fluorescence intensity. A detailed protocol for screening 10-20 mutant seedlings per day is provided. The detailed imaging protocol provided here is suitable for analysing sugar flux in young wild-type plants as well as mutants affected in sugar signalling, metabolism, or transport using a wide spectrum of FRET nanosensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available