4.7 Article

Caesium and strontium accumulation in shoots of Arabidopsis thaliana: genetic and physiological aspects

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 61, Issue 14, Pages 3995-4009

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq213

Keywords

Accumulation; Arabidopsis; caesium (Cs+); discrimination; quantitative trait loci (QTL); strontium (Sr2+)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the physico-chemical similarities of caesium (Cs+) to potassium (K+) on the one hand and strontium (Sr2+) to calcium (Ca2+) on the other hand, both elements can easily be taken up by plants and thus enter the food chain. This could be detrimental when radionuclides such as Cs-137 and Sr-90 are involved. In this study, both genetic and physiological aspects of Cs+ and Sr2+ accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana were investigated using 86 Arabidopsis accessions and a segregating F-2 population of the low Cs+ accumulating Sq-1 (Ascot, UK) crossed with the high uptaking Sorbo (Khurmatov, Tajikistan). Hydroponically grown plants were exposed to subtoxic levels of Cs+ and Sr2+ using radioactive isotopes as tracers. In the natural accessions shoot concentration of Cs+ as well as Sr2+ varied about 2-fold, whereas its heritability ranged for both ions between 0.60 and 0.73. Shoot accumulation of Cs+ and Sr2+ could be compromised by increasing concentrations of their essential analogues K+ and Ca2+, respectively, causing a reduction of up to 80%. In the case of the segregating F-2/F-3 population Sq-1xSorbo, this study identified several QTL for the trait Cs+ and Sr2+ accumulation, with main QTL on chromosomes 1 and 5. According to the correlation and discrimination surveys combined with QTL-analysis Cs+ and Sr2+ uptake seemed to be mediated mostly via non-selective cation channels. A polymorphism, affecting amino acids close to the K+-pore of one candidate, CYCLIC-NUCLEOTIDE-GATED CHANNEL 1 (CNGC1), was identified in Sorbo and associated with high Cs+ concentrating accessions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available