4.7 Article

L-Glutamine inhibits beta-aminobutyric acid-induced stress resistance and priming in Arabidopsis

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 995-1002

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp363

Keywords

Acquired thermotolerance; Arabidopsis; beta-aminobutyric acid; priming; Pseudomonas syringae; stress; stress imprinting; stress-induced morphogenic response

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [96-2628B-002-112-MY3]
  2. National Taiwan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The non-protein amino acid beta-aminobutyric acid (BABA) enhances Arabidopsis resistance to microbial pathogens and abiotic stresses through potentiation of the Arabidopsis defence responses. In this study, it is shown that BABA induces the stress-induced morphogenic response (SIMR). SIMR is observed in plants exposed to sub-lethal stress conditions. Anthocyanin, a known modulator of stress signalling, was also found to accumulate in BABA-treated Arabidopsis. These data and a previous microarray study indicate that BABA induces a stress response in Arabidopsis. High concentrations of amino acids, except for L-glutamine, cause a general amino acid stress inhibition. General amino acid inhibition is prevented by the addition of L-glutamine. L-Glutamine was found to inhibit the BABA-mediated SIMR and anthocyanin accumulation, suggesting that the non-protein amino acid BABA causes a general amino acid stress inhibition in Arabidopsis. L-Glutamine also blocked BABA-induced resistance to heat stress and to the virulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. During bacterial infection, priming of the salicylic acid-dependent defence marker PR1 was abolished by L-glutamine treatment. These results indicate that L-glutamine removal of the BABA-mediated stress response is concomitant with L-glutamine inhibition of BABA priming and BABA-induced resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available