4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Nitric oxide function and signalling in plant disease resistance

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 147-154

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm244

Keywords

hypersensitive response; nitric oxide; plant disease resistance; S-nitrosylation; S-nitrosothiols

Categories

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D011809/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. BBSRC [BB/D011809/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D011809/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide (NO) is one of only a handful of gaseous signalling molecules. Its discovery as the endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) by Ignarro revolutionized how NO and cognate reactive nitrogen intermediates, which were previously considered to be toxic molecules, are viewed. NO is now emerging as a key signalling molecule in plants, where it orchestrates a plethora of cellular activities associated with growth, development, and environmental interactions. Prominent among these is its function in plant hypersensitive cell death and disease resistance. While a number of sources for NO biosynthesis have been proposed, robust and biologically relevant routes for NO production largely remain to be defined. To elaborate cell death during an incompatible plant-pathogen interaction NO functions in combination with reactive oxygen intermediates. Furthermore, NO has been shown to regulate the activity of metacaspases, evolutionary conserved proteases that may be intimately associated with pathogen-triggered cell death. NO is also thought to function in multiple modes of plant disease resistance by regulating, through S-nitrosylation, multiple nodes of the salicylic acid (SA) signalling pathway. These findings underscore the key role of NO in plant-pathogen interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available