4.5 Article

Combining sky and earth: desert ants (Melophorus bagoti) show weighted integration of celestial and terrestrial cues

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 217, Issue 23, Pages 4159-4166

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.107862

Keywords

Desert ant; Direction; Information; Integration; Navigation; Orientation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grant [38861]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP0770300, DP110100608]
  3. NSERC doctoral Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship
  4. Fyssen Foundation
  5. Macquarie University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insects typically use celestial sources of directional information for path integration, and terrestrial panoramic information for view-based navigation. Here we set celestial and terrestrial sources of directional information in conflict for homing desert ants (Melophorus bagoti). In the first experiment, ants learned to navigate out of a round experimental arena with a distinctive artificial panorama. On crucial tests, we rotated the arena to create a conflict between the artificial panorama and celestial information. In a second experiment, ants at a feeder in their natural visually-cluttered habitat were displaced prior to their homing journey so that the dictates of path integration (feeder to nest direction) based on a celestial compass conflicted with the dictates of view-based navigation (release point to nest direction) based on the natural terrestrial panorama. In both experiments, ants generally headed in a direction intermediate to the dictates of celestial and terrestrial information. In the second experiment, the ants put more weight on the terrestrial cues when they provided better directional information. We conclude that desert ants weight and integrate the dictates of celestial and terrestrial information in determining their initial heading, even when the two directional cues are highly discrepant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available