4.5 Article

GABAB receptors play an essential role in maintaining sleep during the second half of the night in Drosophila melanogaster

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 216, Issue 20, Pages 3837-3843

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.085563

Keywords

circadian clock neurons; metabotropic GABA receptors; PDF neurons

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB581, TP28, Fo207/14-1]
  2. Swedish Research Council [621-2007-6500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GABAergic signalling is important for normal sleep in humans and flies. Here we advance the current understanding of GABAergic modulation of daily sleep patterns by focusing on the role of slow metabotropic GABA(B) receptors in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. We asked whether GABA(B)-R2 receptors are regulatory elements in sleep regulation in addition to the already identified fast ionotropic Rdl GABA(A) receptors. By immunocytochemical and reporter-based techniques we show that the pigment dispersing factor (PDF)-positive ventrolateral clock neurons (LNv) express GABA(B)-R2 receptors. Downregulation of GABA(B)-R2 receptors in the large PDF neurons (l-LNv) by RNAi reduced sleep maintenance in the second half of the night, whereas sleep latency at the beginning of the night that was previously shown to depend on ionotropic Rdl GABA(A) receptors remained unaltered. Our results confirm the role of the l-LNv neurons as an important part of the sleep circuit in D. melanogaster and also identify the GABA(B)-R2 receptors as the thus far missing component in GABA-signalling that is essential for sleep maintenance. Despite the significant effects on sleep, we did not observe any changes in circadian behaviour in flies with downregulated GABA(B)-R2 receptors, indicating that the regulation of sleep maintenance via l-LNv neurons is independent of their function in the circadian clock circuit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available