4.5 Article

Mechanics and energetics of load carriage during human walking

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 217, Issue 4, Pages 605-613

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.091587

Keywords

Biomechanics; Energetic costs; Load carriage walking

Categories

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research (ETOWL program)
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-09-2-0142]
  3. National Institutes of Health [AG0308]
  4. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Atlas Program)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although humans clearly expend more energy to walk with an extra load, it is unclear what biomechanical mechanisms contribute to that increase. One possible contribution is the mechanical work performed on the body center of mass (COM), which simple models predict should increase linearly with added mass. The work should be performed primarily by the lower extremity joints, although in unknown distribution, and cost a proportionate amount of metabolic energy. We therefore tested normal adults (N=8) walking at constant speed (1.25 m s(-1)) with varying backpack loads up to 40% of body weight. We measured mechanical work (both performed on the COM and joint work from inverse dynamics), as well as metabolic energy expenditure through respirometry. Both measures of work were found to increase approximately linearly with carried load, with COM work rate increasing by approximately 1.40 W for each 1 kg of additional load. The joints all contributed work, but the greatest increase in positive work was attributable to the ankle during push-off (45-60% of stride time) and the knee in the rebound after collision (12-30% stride). The hip performed increasing amounts of negative work, near the end of stance. Rate of metabolic energy expenditure also increased approximately linearly with load, by approximately 7.6 W for each 1 kg of additional load. The ratio of the increases in work and metabolic cost yielded a relatively constant efficiency of approximately 16%. The metabolic cost not explained by work appeared to be relatively constant with load and did not exhibit a particular trend. Most of the increasing cost for carrying a load appears to be explained by positive mechanical work, especially about the ankle and knee, with both work and metabolic cost increasing nearly linearly with added mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available