4.5 Article

Worker division of labor and endocrine physiology are associated in the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 215, Issue 3, Pages 454-460

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.060822

Keywords

behavior; division of labor; ecdysteroids; endocrine; Formicidae; juvenile hormone

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [180504, 185306, 191699]
  2. National Institute on Aging [NIA] [P01 AG22500]
  3. PEW Charitable Trust
  4. Arizona State University Graduate and Professional Students Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Pogonomyrmex californicus harvester ants, an age-associated division of labor occurs in the worker caste, in which young workers perform in-nest tasks and older workers forage for food. Here, we tested whether this behavioral division is age based or age flexible, and whether it coincides with differential expression of systemic hormones with known roles in behavioral regulation. Whole-body content of juvenile hormone (JH) and ecdysteroids was determined in workers from (1) age-typical colonies, in which a typical age structure is maintained and workers transition across behaviors naturally, and (2) single-cohort colonies, which are entirely composed of same-aged workers, facilitating the establishment of age-independent division of labor. Foragers from both colony types had higher JH and lower ecdysteroid content than workers performing in-nest tasks, suggesting that age is not the sole determinant of worker behavior. This association between hormone content and behavior of P. californicus workers is similar to that previously observed in founding queens of this species. Because these hormones are key regulators of development and reproductive behavior, our data are consistent with the reproductive ground plan hypothesis (RGPH), which posits that the reproductive regulatory mechanisms of solitary ancestors were co-opted to regulate worker behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available