4.7 Article

An improved MIP heuristic for the intermodal hub location problem

Journal

OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 203-211

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.016

Keywords

Heuristics; Optimization; Mixed integer programming; Lagrangian relaxation; Hub location

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51105394]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30920130111001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optimization methods have been commonly developed for the intermodal hub location problem because it has a broad range of practical applications. These methods include exact methods (limited on solving large-size problems) and heuristics (no guarantee on solution quality). In order to avoid their weakness but to leverage their strength, we develop an improved MIP heuristic combining branch-and-bound, Lagrangian relaxation, and linear programming relaxation. In the heuristic, we generate a population of initial feasible solutions using the branch-and-bound and Lagrangian relaxation methods and create a linear-relaxed solution using the linear programming relaxation method. We combine these feasible and linear-relaxed solutions to fix a portion of hub location variables so as to create a number of restricted hub location subproblems. We then combine the branch-and-bound method to solve these restricted subproblems for iteratively improving solution quality. We discuss in detail the application of the method to the intermodal hub location problem. The discussion is followed by extensive statistical analysis and computational tests, where the analysis shows statistical significance of solutions for guiding the heuristic search and comparisons with other methods indicate that the proposed approach is computationally tractable and is able to obtain competitive results. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available