4.7 Article

A four-long non-coding RNA signature in predicting breast cancer survival

Journal

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-014-0084-7

Keywords

Long non coding RNA; lncRNA; Breast cancer; Prognostic; Biomarker; Expression; Gene signature; Survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Shanghai Jiaotong University [YG2012ZD02, 2JC1407400]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai, China
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272506, 61227017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Many long non-coding RNAs(lncRNAs) have been found to be a good marker for several tumors. Using lncRNA-mining approach, we aimed to identify lncRNA expression signature that can predict breast cancer patient survival. Methods: We performed LncRNA expression profiling in 887 breast cancer patients from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. The association between lncRNA signature and clinical survival was analyzed using the training set(n = 327, from GSE 20685). The validation for the association was performed in another three independent testing sets(252 from GSE21653, 204 from GSE12276, and 104 from GSE42568). Results: A set of four lncRNA genes (U79277, AK024118, BC040204, AK000974) have been identified by the random survival forest algorithm. Using a risk score based on the expression signature of these lncRNAs, we separated the patients into low-risk and high-risk groups with significantly different survival times in the training set. This signature was validated in the other three cohorts. Further study revealed that the four-lncRNA expression signature was independent of age and subtype. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) suggested that gene sets were involved in several cancer metastasis related pathways. Conclusions: These findings indicate that lncRNAs may be implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis. The four-lncRNA signature may have clinical implications in the selection of high-risk patients for adjuvant therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available