4.7 Article

Expression and prognostic value of VEGFR-2, PDGFR-β, and c-Met in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-16

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; VEGFR-2; PDGFR-beta; c-Met; Survival analysis; Sorafenib

Categories

Funding

  1. Pathology Department of 307 Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We explore the clinical and prognostic significance of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-beta, and c-Met in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: The expression of VEGFR-2, PDGFR-beta, and c-Met were determined by immunohistochemical examination of the tissues of 93 HCC patients. The relationships of these markers with clinicopathological factors and prognosis were then analyzed. Results: High expression of VEGFR-2, PDGFR-beta, and c-Met was found in 86%, 19.4%, and 80.6% of patients, respectively. Expression of VEGFR-2 correlated with gender (P = 0.044), hepatitis B surface antigen positivity (P = 0.024), degree of tumor differentiation (P = 0.023), and hepatic cirrhosis (P = 0.026). Expression of PDGFR-beta correlated with alpha-fetoprotein level (P = 0.029), tumor size (P = 0.033), and hepatic cirrhosis (P = 0.023). No significant correlations were identified between expression of c-Met and clinicopathological factors. Expression of PDGFR-beta correlated with overall survival (P = 0.046) and expression of c-Met correlated with progression-free survival (P = 0.01). Conclusions: We found that in patients with HCC, high expression of VEGFR-2 correlates with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and hepatic cirrhosis. High expression of PDGFR-beta is a predictor of poor prognosis. High expression of C-Met may predict therapeutic effectiveness of sorafenib in HCC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available