4.2 Review

Phylogenetic comparative approaches for studying niche conservatism

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 2529-2539

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02144.x

Keywords

comparative methods; macroevolutionary models; phylogenetic niche conservatism; phylogeny; R functions

Funding

  1. NSF [BCS-0648733]
  2. Royal Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analyses of phylogenetic niche conservatism (PNC) are becoming increasingly common. However, each analysis makes subtly different assumptions about the evolutionary mechanism that generates patterns of niche conservatism. To understand PNC, analyses should be conducted with reference to a clear underlying model, using appropriate methods. Here, we outline five macroevolutionary models that may underlie patterns of PNC (drift, niche retention, phylogenetic inertia, niche filling/shifting and evolutionary rates) and link these to published phylogenetic comparative methods. For each model, we give recent examples from the literature and suggest how the methods can be practically applied. We hope that this will help clarify the niche conservatism literature and encourage people to think about the evolutionary models underlying niche conservatism in their study group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available