4.2 Article

Sex-specific selection on energy metabolism - selection coefficients for winter survival

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1969-1978

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02059.x

Keywords

body condition; energetics; mammals; Myodes glareolus; selection; sexual antagonism

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [115961, 119200, 118603, 109165, 204284, 104568, 108955]
  2. Marie Curie Training Sites
  3. Centre of Excellence in Evolutionary Research of the Academy of Finland
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [115961, 104568, 109165, 204284, 118603, 204284, 119200, 108955, 109165, 104568, 115961, 108955, 118603, 119200] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selection for different fitness optima between sexes is supposed to operate on several traits. As fitness-related traits are often energetically costly, selection should also act directly on the energetics of individuals. However, efforts to examine the relationship between fitness and components of the energy budget are surprisingly scarce. We investigated the effects of basal metabolic rate (BMR, the minimum energy required for basic life functions) and body condition on long-term survival (8 winter months) with manipulated densities in enclosed populations of bank voles (Myodes glareolus). Here, we show that survival selection on BMR was clearly sex-specific but density-independent. Both the linear selection gradient and selection differential for BMR were positive in females, whereas survival did not correlate with male characteristics. Our findings emphasize the relative importance of individual physiology over ecological factors (e.g. intra-specific competition). Most current models of the origin of endothermy underline the importance of metabolic optima in females, whose physiology evolved to fulfil demands of parental provisioning in mammals. Our novel findings of sex-specific selection could be related to these life history differences between sexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available