4.2 Article

Intraspecific ecomorphological variation: linear and geometric morphometrics reveal habitat-related patterns within Podarcis bocagei wall lizards

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 1234-1244

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01984.x

Keywords

adaptation; ground-dwelling; head shape; Iberian Peninsula; limb length; saxicolous; sexual dimorphism

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [SFRH/BD/28565/2006, POCI/BIABDE/55865/2004]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/28565/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Morphological variation in relation to habitat is known to occur in several lizard groups. Comparative studies have linked morphology and habitat use, showing that locomotion is the principal mediator of this evolutionary relationship. Here, we investigate intraspecific ecomorphological variation in Podarcis bocagei by examining three habitat types, representing a variety between saxicolous and ground-dwelling habits. Our results indicate variation in absolute and relative limb length, but patterns are only partially concordant to biomechanical predictions. Whereas the femur and hind foot are longer in ground-dwelling lizards, confirming previous observations, the tibia and hind limb are relatively shorter, contradicting expectations. Additionally, head shape varies substantially between habitats, in line with a hypothesis of mechanical restrictions related to microhabitat and refuge use. Finally, we detect male-specific variation between habitats in total body size and head size, providing evidence for interactions between natural and sexual selection. Although performance and behaviour studies are necessary to definitely confirm the functional and evolutionary significance of the observed patterns, our study indicates that ecomorphological adaptations can arise in a very short evolutionary time in this group of lizards.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available