4.2 Article

Demography and the tragedy of the commons

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 32-39

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01893.x

Keywords

group selection; kin selection; life history; social evolution

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EF-0822399]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [U01-GM-76499]
  3. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [U01GM076499] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individual success in group-structured populations has two components. First, an individual gains by outcompeting its neighbours for local resources. Second, an individual's share of group success must be weighted by the total productivity of the group. The essence of sociality arises from the tension between selfish gains against neighbours and the associated loss that selfishness imposes by degrading the efficiency of the group. Without some force to modulate selfishness, the natural tendencies of self interest typically degrade group performance to the detriment of all. This is the tragedy of the commons. Kin selection provides the most widely discussed way in which the tragedy is overcome in biology. Kin selection arises from behavioural associations within groups caused either by genetical kinship or by other processes that correlate the behaviours of group members. Here, I emphasize demography as a second factor that may also modulate the tragedy of the commons and favour cooperative integration of groups. Each act of selfishness or cooperation in a group often influences group survival and fecundity over many subsequent generations. For example, a cooperative act early in the growth cycle of a colony may enhance the future size and survival of the colony. This time-dependent benefit can greatly increase the degree of cooperation favoured by natural selection, providing another way in which to overcome the tragedy of the commons and enhance the integration of group behaviour. I conclude that analyses of sociality must account for both the behavioural associations of kin selection theory and the demographic consequences of life history theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available