4.2 Article

Are hybrid species more fit than ancestral parent species in the current hybrid species habitats?

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 805-816

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01950.x

Keywords

desert; fitness; speciation; sunflower; survival

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0131078, 0614739]
  2. National Institute of Health [GM59065]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0614739] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0131078] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hybrid speciation is thought to be facilitated by escape of early generation hybrids into new habitats, subsequent environmental selection and adaptation. Here, we ask whether two homoploid hybrid plant species (Helianthus anomalus, H. deserticola) diverged sufficiently from their ancestral parent species (H. annuus, H. petiolaris) during hybrid speciation so that they are more fit than the parent species in hybrid species habitats. Hybrid and parental species were reciprocally transplanted into hybrid and parental habitats. Helianthus anomalus was more fit than parental species in the H. anomalus actively moving desert dune habitat. The abilities to tolerate burial and excavation and to obtain nutrients appear to be important for success in the H. anomalus habitat. In contrast, H. deserticola failed to outperform the parental species in the H. deserticola stabilized desert dune habitat, and several possible explanations are discussed. The home site advantage of H. anomalus is consistent with environmental selection having been a mechanism for adaptive divergence and hybrid speciation and supports the use of H. anomalus as a valuable system for further assessment of environmental selection and adaptive traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available