4.2 Article

Spatially heterogeneous stochasticity and the adaptive diversification of dormancy

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages 2094-2103

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01825.x

Keywords

adaptive diversification; bet-hedging; diapause; dormancy; environmental stochasticity; local adaptation; spatial heterogeneity

Funding

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) [UMR 5558]
  2. Universite Lyon 1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diversified bet-hedging, a strategy that leads several individuals with the same genotype to express distinct phenotypes in a given generation, is now well established as a common evolutionary response to environmental stochasticity. Life-history traits defined as diversified bet-hedging (e.g. germination or diapause strategies) display marked differences between populations in spatial proximity. In order to find out whether such differences can be explained by local adaptations to spatially heterogeneous environmental stochasticity, we explored the evolution of bet-hedging dormancy strategies in a metapopulation using a two-patch model with patch differences in stochastic juvenile survival. We found that spatial differences in the level of environmental stochasticity, restricted dispersal, increased fragmentation and intermediate survival during dormancy all favour the adaptive diversification of bet-hedging dormancy strategies. Density dependency also plays a major role in the diversification of dormancy strategies because: (i) it may interact locally with environmental stochasticity and amplify its effects; however, (ii) it can also generate chaotic population dynamics that may impede diversification. Our work proposes new hypotheses to explain the spatial patterns of bet-hedging strategies that we hope will encourage new empirical studies of this topic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available