4.2 Article

Heritability of and strong single gene (Pgi) effects on life-history traits in the Glanville fritillary butterfly

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 1944-1953

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01807.x

Keywords

broad-sense heritability; Glanville fritillary butterfly; host-plant preference; life-history; lifespan; metapopulation; Pgi

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [213457, 211173]
  2. Finnish Centre of Excellence [2000-08]
  3. Lammi Biological Station
  4. University of Helsinki
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [211173, 211173] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We estimated broad-sense heritabilities (H-2) of 13 female and seven male life-history traits of the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia) under semi-natural conditions in a large outdoor population cage. The analysis was based on full-sib families collected as young larvae in the field and reared under common garden conditions. We found significant genetic variance in female lifespan, fecundity, number of matings and host-plant preference as well as in male body mass and mobility. Apart from host-plant preference, female traits that were more strongly correlated with lifetime reproductive success (LRS; measured as total number of eggs laid) had higher H-2. LRS itself exhibited significant heritability. Host-plant preference had very high H-2, consistent with a previously reported genetically determined geographical cline in host-plant preference in the study area. Lifespan and egg hatching rate were significantly associated with a SNP in the coding region of the Pgi gene, for which there is previous evidence for balancing selection. Selection on Pgi, which furthermore shows spatial and temporal variation, may maintain genetic variance in fitness-related life-history traits. In contrast, we found no strong evidence for life-history trade-offs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available