4.5 Article

Covarying variances: more morphologically variable populations also exhibit more diet variation

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 178, Issue 1, Pages 89-101

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3200-7

Keywords

Ecomorphology; Individual specialization; Niche variation hypothesis; Microhabitat preference; Stable isotopes

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0412808]
  2. David and Lucille Packard Foundation fellowship
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1145468] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many ecologically generalized populations are composed of relatively specialized individuals that selectively consume a subset of their population's diet, a phenomenon known as 'individual specialization'. The Niche Variation Hypothesis posits that this individual specialization can arise during ecological release if niche expansion occurs mainly through diet divergence among individuals, leading to greater morphological variation. Most tests of this hypothesis have searched for correlations between niche width and morphological variance, but this approach rests on the untested assumption that within-population morphological diversity is highly correlated with ecological diversity. Here, we test whether intrapopulation diet variation is correlated with intrapopulation morphological variation, across 12 lacustrine populations of three-spine stickleback. First, we use behavioral observations, isotopes, and gut contents to show that, within populations, individuals differ in microhabitat use and diet. Second, we show that some populations exhibit more diet variation than others, as evidenced by differences in both isotopic and gut content variation among individuals. Finally, we confirm that populations with greater dietary variation are more morphologically variable. However, this relationship is only significant when total morphological variance is examined, not for individual morphological traits. This discordance may reflect among-population differences in the relationship between individual morphology and diet. Because morphology-diet relationships can differ among populations, morphological variance may be a poor predictor of actual diet variation when diverse populations are being compared.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available