4.2 Review

Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 12-18

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x

Keywords

instruments; methodological research; quality assessment; systematic reviews

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada [129697, PET69772]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
  4. Bone and Joint Health, and Physiotherapy Foundation of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The Cochrane Collaboration is strongly encouraging the use of a newly developed tool, the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (CCRBT), for all review groups. However, the psychometric properties of this tool to date have yet to be described. Thus, the objective of this study was to add information about psychometric properties of the CCRBT including inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity, in comparison with the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available