4.7 Article

Carthamus red from Carthamus tinctorius L. exerts antioxidant and hepatoprotective effect against CCl4-induced liver damage in rats via the Nrf2 pathway

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 148, Issue 2, Pages 570-578

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.04.054

Keywords

Antioxidant activity; Carthamus tinctorius L; Carthamus red; Hepatoprotective effect; Nrf2

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273523]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Carthamus red isolated from safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L, a Chinese traditional medicine) is evaluated for antioxidant and hepatoprotective activity. Materials and methods: Carthamus red was isolated from a Na2CO3 extract of safflower and its analysis was carried out by HPLC/MS. Acute toxicity study was determined and the antioxidant activity was investigated using various established in vitro systems. An in vivo study against CCl4-induced liver injury was also conducted and compared with that of silymarin, a known hepatoprotective drug. Results: Carthamus red did not show any toxicity and mortality up to 2000 mg/kg dose, and it showed strong antioxidant ability in vitro. In the in vivo study, carthamus red treatment lowered the serum levels of ALT, AST, ALP and total protein in liver damage rat models. Meanwhile, Nrf2, GST alpha and NQO1 expressions were up-regulated at the protein level by carthamus red intervention. Additionally, the activities of antioxidant enzymes and level of GSH were elevated by carthamus red intervention, while the content of TBARS, which is an oxidative stress marker, was lessened. HE stain analysis showed that the condition of liver damage was mitigated. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that carthamus red may serve as a candidate with strong a hepato protective effect and antioxidant activity in liver damage. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available