4.7 Article

Authentication of the family Polygonaceae in Chinese pharmacopoeia by DNA barcoding technique

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages 434-439

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.05.042

Keywords

Polygonaceae; DNA barcode; Identification; Chinese pharmacopoeia; Adulterant

Funding

  1. International Cooperation Program of Science and Technology [2007DFA30990]
  2. Special Founding for Healthy Field [200802043]
  3. Hong Kong Research Grant Council [HKU 7526/06M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Medicinal plants belonging to the family Polygonaceae in Chinese pharmacopoeia possess important medicinal efficacy in traditional Chinese medicines. Aim of the study: DNA barcodes are first used to discriminate the Polygonaceae in Chinese pharmacopoeia and their adulterants. Materials and methods: DNA samples, extracted from thirty-eight specimens belonging to eighteen species in Polygonaceae, were used as templates. Eight candidate barcodes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction. Sequence analysis was accomplished by CodonCode Aligner V 2.06 and DNAman V 6. Species identification was performed using MEGA V 4.0. Results: The amplification efficiency of six candidate DNA barcodes (rbcL, trnH-psbA, ndhJ, rpoB, rpoC1, accD) was 100%, while the efficiency of YCF5 and nrITS was 56% and 44%, respectively. The interspecific divergence was highest for the trnH-psbA (20.05%), followed by the nrITS (14.01%) across all species pairs. while intraspecific variation both within populations and between populations was absent (0.0%). The trnH-psbA can not only distinguish ten species of Polygonaceae in Chinese pharmacopoeia, but also recognize eight other species of Polygonaceae including their adulterants. Conclusion: Our findings show that DNA barcoding is an efficient tool for identification of Polygonaceae in Chinese pharmacopoeia and their adulterants. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available