4.7 Article

Evaluation of antimicrobial, antioxidant and wound-healing potentials of Holoptelea integrifolia

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages 249-256

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.09.031

Keywords

Holoptelea integrifolia (Roxb.) (Urticaceae); tensile strength; minimum inhibition concentration; mimimum microbicidal concentration; total phenolic content; DPPH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The methanolic extracts of Holoptelea integrifolia (Roxb.) (Urticaceae) leaves (MLE) and stem bark (MSBE) were studied for the wound-healing potential. Since wound healing is severely hampered by microbial infection and reactive oxygen species (ROS), this study was undertaken to evaluate antimicrobial and antioxidant activity apart from wound-healing activity. The antimicrobial property of the Holoptelea was studied against the six bacterial and five fungal strains using the agar well diffusion method and minimum microbicidal concentration and minimum inhibitory concentration were determined for each strain, in which methanolic extract of stem bark (MSBE) has shown bigger zone of inhibition (11.3-20.4 mm) than methanolic extract of leaves (MLE) (9.6-14.9 mm). The anti-oxidant activity was evaluated by DPPH free radical scavenging activity using HPLC method. The IC50 values obtained for MSBE (TPC: 78.53 +/- 1.26 mg/g) and MLE (TPC: 57.71 +/- 1.45 mg/g) were 37.66 +/- 0.48 and 50.36 +/- 0.59 mu g/well, respectively. In excision wound model, more than 90% wound healing was recorded in treated groups by 14 days of post surgery, where as only 62.99% was observed in the control group. In incision model, higher breaking strengths and higher hydroxyproline content in treated groups suggested higher collagen re-deposition than the control group. Finally, histopathology studies conformed wound-healing activity of Holoptelea integrifolia. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available