4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical comparisons of self-reacting point absorber wave energy converters in regular waves

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 370-386

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.05.027

Keywords

Wave energy conversion; Model testing; Frequency domain; Power take-off; Self-reacting; Point absorbers

Funding

  1. Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (PICS)
  2. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  4. Memorial University Ocean Engineering Research Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental and numerical comparison of the performance of two self-reacting point absorber wave energy converter designs is undertaken for heave motions. The designs are either currently, or have recently been, under development for commercialization. The experiments consist of a series of 1:25 scale model tests. The physical model features a re-configurable reacting body shape, a feedback controlled power take-off, and a heave motion constraint apparatus. Detailed descriptions of the reconfigurable model design, the analysis/test methodologies, and power capture are given. An extension of Budal's theoretical upper bound on power capture for application to self-reacting point absorbers is proposed. A quantitative comparison is made of the two self-reacting point absorber designs in terms of displacement, power take-off force requirements, and power capture in typical (non-extreme) operating conditions with reference to theoretical upper bounds. The design implications of a reactive power take-off control scheme and relative motion constraints on the wave energy converters are investigated using an experimentally validated numerical dynamics model. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available