4.6 Article

Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to hydrocarbon fuel using carbon and nitrogen co-doped sodium titanate nanotubes

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 498, Issue -, Pages 205-213

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.044

Keywords

Sodium titanate nanotubes; Carbon nitrogen co-doping; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; Photocatalytic CO2 conversion

Funding

  1. DGIST RAMP
  2. D Program of the Ministry of Science, ICT AMP
  3. Future Planning [15-BD-0404]
  4. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT AMP
  5. Future Planning [NRF-2013R1A1A1008678]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon and nitrogen co-doped sodium titanate nanotubes (C,N-TNT) active under simulated solar light are synthesized by a simple two-step process comprising an alkaline hydrothermal technique followed by calcination. Different samples of C,N-TNT with varied dopant concentrations are achieved by changing the amount of urea as a nitrogen and carbon dopants. The photocatalysts are characterized using numerous experimental techniques, and under simulated solar light investigated for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 and water vapor to CH4. The C,N-TNT sample with an intermediate doping concentration yields the maximum methane yield of 9.75 mu mol/g h. The key factors contributing in the improvement of photocatalyst performance includes light absorption, surface area and Na+ ions concentration in TNT acting as CO2 adsorption site and photogenerated electrons recombination centers. The higher doping levels results in lower specific surface areas leading to decrease in photocatalyst performance. Our results suggest co-doping of nanostructured photocatalysts is an excellent pathway for improving textural and photocatalytic properties for the respective application domain. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available