4.7 Article

Significant wave height estimation using SVR algorithms and shadowing information from simulated and real measured X-band radar images of the sea surface

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 244-253

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.041

Keywords

Significant wave height prediction; Sea clutter images; Support Vector Regression; Simulation

Funding

  1. Rutter Inc.
  2. OceanWaveS GmbH, under project Analysis of Shadowing at Grazing Incidence to Derive Significant Wave Height [2013/00162/001]
  3. Spanish Ministerial Commission of Science and Technology (MICYT) [TIN2014-54583-C2-2-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we propose to apply the Support Vector Regression (SVR) methodology to significant wave height estimation using the shadowing effect, that is visible on the X-band marine radar images of the sea surface due to the presence of high waves. One of the main problems of using sea clutter images is that, for a given sea state conditions, the shadowing effect depends on the radar antenna installation features, such as the angle of incidence. On the other hand, for a given radar antenna location, the shadowing properties depend on the different sea state parameters, like wave periods, and wave lengths. Thus, in this paper we show that SVR can be successfully trained from simulation-based data. We propose a simulation process for X-band marine radar images derived from simulated wave elevation fields using the stochastic wave theory. We show the performance of the SVR in simulation data and how SVR outperforms alternative algorithms such as neural networks. Finally, we show that the simulation process is reliable by applying the SVR methodology trained in the simulation-based data to real measured data, obtaining good prediction results in wave height, which indicates the goodness of our proposal. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available