4.6 Article

Adult asthma increases dementia risk: a nationwide cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 123-128

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-204445

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China Medical University [CMU102-BC-2]
  2. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence [MOHW103-TDU-B-212-113002]
  3. Health and welfare surcharge of tobacco products, China Medical University Hospital Cancer Research Center of Excellence (Taiwan) [MOHW103-TD-B-111-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Studies on the association between adult asthma and dementia are few. We investigated the risk of dementia in patients diagnosed with adult asthma compared with that of people without asthma who were age and sex matched to the study patients. Methods We used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 12 771 patients with newly diagnosed asthma between 2001 and 2003 were evaluated and 51 084 people without asthma were used as the comparison cohort. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to measure the HR of dementia for the asthmatic cohort, compared with that of the non-asthmatic cohort. Results The HR of dementia was 1.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15 to 1.41) for the asthmatic cohort, compared with the non-asthmatic cohort after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, annual outpatient department visits and medicine used. The HR of dementia development increased substantially as frequency of asthma exacerbation and hospitalisation increased. Conclusions This nationwide cohort study suggests that the risk of dementia development is significantly increased in patients with asthma compared with that of the general population. In addition, dementia risk increases substantially with asthma exacerbation and hospitalisation frequency increases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available