4.6 Article

Willingness to engage in peer-delivered HIV voluntary counselling and testing among people who inject drugs in a Canadian setting

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 68, Issue 7, Pages 675-678

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-203707

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01DA011591]
  2. Canada Research Chairs programme through a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Inner City Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background People who inject drugs (IDU) face unique systemic, social and individual barriers to conventional HIV voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) programmes. Peer-delivered approaches represent a possible alternative to improve rates of testing among this population. Methods Cross-sectional data from a prospective cohort of IDU in Vancouver, Canada, were collected between December 2011 and May 2012. Bivariate statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify the prevalence of and factors associated with willingness to receive peer-delivered VCT. Results Of 600 individuals, 51.5% indicated willingness to receive peer-delivered pretest counselling, 40.7% to receive peer-delivered rapid HIV testing and 42.8% to receive peer-delivered post-test counselling. Multivariate analyses found significant positive associations between willingness for pretest counselling and having used Vancouver's supervised injection facility, Insite, or being a member of VANDU (a local drug user organisation) (all p<0.05). Daily crack smoking and having used Insite were positively associated with willingness to receive peer-delivered HIV testing (p<0.05). Willingness to receive peer-delivered post-test counselling was positively associated with male gender, daily crack smoking, having used Insite and being a member of VANDU (p<0.05). Conclusions While not universally acceptable, peer-delivered VCT approaches may improve access to HIV testing among IDU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available