4.6 Article

Ozone and cause-specific cardiorespiratory morbidity and mortality

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 64, Issue 9, Pages 814-820

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2009.087106

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. TEKES [40715/01]
  2. Ministry of Education (Graduate School in Environment Health SYTYKE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Health effects of ozone have been observed in numerous studies. However, analyses of more cause-specific morbidity or mortality outcomes have rarely been performed. A study was undertaken to determine the short-term associations of ozone with cause-specific cardiorespiratory mortality and morbidity by age groups. Methods Daily levels of ozone were measured at a background measurement station in 1998-2004 in Helsinki, Finland. All analyses were a priori restricted to the warm season. Daily cause-specific cardiorespiratory mortality and hospital admissions were studied in elderly people (>= 65 years) and adults (15-64 years) and associations between ozone and asthma emergency room visits in children (< 15 years) were analysed. All models were adjusted for PM2.5 and Poisson regression was used for the analyses. Results There was a positive association between ozone and admissions for asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in elderly people (9.6%; 95% CI 2.0% to 17.8% at 0-day lag for 25 mu g/m(3) increase in ozone). Consistent associations were also found between ozone and asthma emergency room visits in children (12.6%; 95% CI 0.8% to 25.1%, 0-day lag). There was a suggestion of an association between ozone and admissions for arrhythmia among elderly people (6.4%; 95% CI 0.63% to 12.5%, 1-day lag), which was slightly confounded by PM2.5. Conclusions Positive associations were found for ambient ozone with asthma visits among children and with pooled asthma/COPD admissions among elderly people. The evidence for a positive association between ozone and cardiovascular health was weaker.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available