4.4 Article

Historical Changes in Histological Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 238-240

Publisher

JAPAN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20180037

Keywords

lung cancer; histological diagnosis; reproducibility

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
  2. US Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Histological classification of lung cancer is essential for investigations of carcinogenesis and treatment selection. We examined the temporal changes of lung cancer histological subtypes. Methods: Lung cancer cases diagnosed in the Life Span Study cohort between 1958 and 1999 were collected from tumor registries (TR), mainly consisting of population-based cancer registries. A total of 1,025 cases were histologically reviewed according to the World Health Organization 2004 Classification by a panel of pathologists (PP). Sensitivity and specificity of diagnoses in TR were calculated, assuming that the diagnosis by PP was the gold standard. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 and 0.92 for adenocarcinoma (AD), respectively, and 0.92 and 0.94, respectively, for squamous cell carcinoma (SQ). They were similar for AD and SQ throughout the observation period. For small cell carcinoma (SM), sensitivity was low until about 1980 (0.47 in 1958-1969, and 0.61 in 1970-1979) and then became higher thereafter (0.98 in 1980-1989, and 0.95 in 1990-1999), whereas specificity was high during the whole period (range 0.99 to 1.00). Among 45 cases that were not reported as SM in TR but diagnosed as SM by PP, 16 cases were recorded as undifferentiated carcinoma in TR. Conclusion: Diagnosis of AD and SQ of lung cancer were generally consistent between TR records and PP review, but SMs tended to be coded as other histological types until the 1970s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available