4.2 Review

Review on fate of chlorine during thermal processing of solid wastes

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 13-28

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.09.003

Keywords

Chlorine; Solid wastes; Thermal processing; Emission; Controlling methods

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621005, 51676170]
  2. Key Project for Strategic International Collaboration on Science and Technology Innovation of the National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFE0202000]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017FZA4013]
  4. Academic Raising Star Training Program for PhD Student of Zhejiang University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlorine (Cl) is extensively present in solid wastes, causing significant problems during the thermal conversion of waste to energy or fuels, by combustion, gasification or pyrolysis. This paper introduces the analytical methods for determining the Cl content in solid materials and presents the concentrations of Cl in various types of wastes, as reported in literature. Then, it provides a comprehensive analysis on the Cl emission behavior and Cl species formed during the thermal processing of the inorganic and organic Cl sources. The challenges resulted from the reactions between the formed Cl species and the ferrous metals, the heavy metals and the organic matters are summarized and discussed, e.g., high temperature corrosion, heavy metal evaporation and dioxin formation. The quality degradation of products (oil, char and syngas) by Cl is analyzed. Finally, the available controlling methods of Cl emission, including pre-treatment (water washing, sorting, microwave irradiation and stepwise pyrolysis) and in-furnace (absorbents, co-treatment and catalysts) methods are assessed. (c) 2018 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available