4.2 Article

Characterization and reactivity of biogenic manganese oxides for ciprofloxacin oxidation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 1154-1161

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60505-7

Keywords

Mn oxidation state; Mn-oxidizing bacteria; superoxide radicals; ciprofloxacin degradation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51138009, 21125731, 51221892]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA062606]
  3. project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-EW-410]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biogenic manganese oxides (BioMnO(x)) were synthesized by the oxidation of Mn(II) with Mn-oxidizing bacteria Pseudomonas sp. G7 under different initial pH values and Mn(II) dosages, and were characterized by X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy. The crystal structure and Mn oxidation states of BioMnOx depended on the initial pH and Mn(II) dosages of the medium. The superoxide radical (O-2(center dot-)) was observed in Mn-containing (III/IV) BioMnO(x) suspensions by electron spin resonance measurements. BioMnO(x)(0.4)-7, with mixed valence of Mn(II/III/IV) and the strongest O-2(center dot-) signals, was prepared in the initial pH 7 and Mn(II) dosage of 0.4 mmol/L condition, and exhibited the highest activity for ciprofloxacin degradation and no Mn(II) release. During the degradation of ciprofloxacin, the oxidation of the Mn(II) formed came from biotic and abiotic reactions in BioMnO(x) suspensions on the basis of the Mn(II) release and O-2(center dot-) formation from different BioMnO(x). The degradation process of ciprofloxacin was shown to involve the cleavage of the hexatomic ring having a secondary amine and carbon-carbon double bond connected to a carboxyl group, producing several compounds containing amine groups as well as small organic acids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available