4.2 Article

Sewage sludge disintegration by high-pressure homogenization: A sludge disintegration model

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 814-820

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60834-6

Keywords

high-pressure homogenization; sludge disintegration; homogenization pressure; homogenization cycle number; total solid content

Funding

  1. MOST of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51178047]
  3. Foundation of Key Laboratory for Solid Waste Management and Environment Safety, Ministry of Education of China [SWMES 2010-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-pressure homogenization (HPH) technology was applied as a pretreatment to disintegrate sewage sludge. The effects of homogenization pressure, homogenization cycle number, and total solid content on sludge disintegration were investigated. The sludge disintegration degree (DDCOD), protein concentration, and polysaccharide concentration increased with the increase of homogenization pressure and homogenization cycle number, and decreased with the increase of sludge total solid (TS) content. The maximum DDCOD of 43.94% was achieved at 80 MPa with four homogenization cycles for a 9.58 g/L TS sludge sample. A HPH sludge disintegration model of DDCOD = kN(a)P(b) was established by multivariable linear regression to quantify the effects of homogenization parameters. The homogenization cycle exponent a and homogenization pressure exponent b were 0.4763 and 0.7324 respectively, showing that the effect of homogenization pressure (P) was more significant than that of homogenization cycle number (N). The value of the rate constant k decreased with the increase of sludge total solid content. The specific energy consumption increased with the increment of sludge disintegration efficiency. Lower specific energy consumption was required for higher total solid content sludge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available