4.2 Article

Optimization of H2O2 dosage in microwave-H2O2 process for sludge pretreatment with uniform design method

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 2060-2067

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60998-4

Keywords

H2O2 dosage; uniform design method; microwave; optimization; sludge pretreatment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51008297]
  2. Hi-Tech Research and Development Program (863) of China [2007AA06Z347]
  3. National Major Science & Technology Projects for Water Pollution Control and Management [2012ZX07202-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A microwave-H2O2 process for sludge pretreatment exhibited high efficiencies of releasing organics, nitrogen, and phosphorus, but large quantities of H2O2 residues were detected. A uniform design method was thus employed in this study to further optimize H2O2 dosage by investigating effects of pH and H2O2 dosage on the amount of H2O2 residue and releases of organics, nitrogen, and phosphorus. A regression model was established with pH and H2O2 dosage as the independent variables, and H2O2 residue and releases of organics, nitrogen, and phosphorus as the dependent variables. In the optimized microwave-H2O2 process, the pH value of the sludge was firstly adjusted to 11.0, then the sludge was heated to 80 degrees C and H2O2 was dosed at a H2O2:mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) ratio of 0.2, and the sludge was finally heated to 100 degrees C by microwave irradiation. Compared to the microwave-H2O2 process without optimization, the H2O2 dosage and the utilization rate of H2O2 in the optimized microwave-H2O2 process were reduced by 80% and greatly improved by 3.87 times, respectively, when the H2O2:MLSS dosage ratio was decreased from 1.0 to 0.2, resulting in nearly the same release rate of soluble chemical oxygen demand in the microwave-H2O2 process without optimization at H2O2:MISS ratio of 0.5.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available