Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.On the Use of In Silico Tools for Prioritising Toxicity Testing of the Low-Volume Industrial Chemicals in REACH
Aleksandra Rybacka et al.
BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY (2014)
Comparison of In Silico Models for Prediction of Mutagenicity
Nazanin G. Bakhtyari et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART C-ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENESIS & ECOTOXICOLOGY REVIEWS (2013)
IARC Classes 1 and 2 carcinogens are successfully identified by an alternative strategy that detects DNA-reactivity and cell transformation ability of chemicals
Romualdo Benigni et al.
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS (2013)
Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay for toxicity prediction: are we there yet?
Romualdo Benigni
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY (2012)
Optimally discriminative subnetwork markers predict response to chemotherapy
Phuong Dao et al.
BIOINFORMATICS (2011)
Comparative Evaluation of in Silico Systems for Ames Test Mutagenicity Prediction: Scope and Limitations
Alexander Hillebrecht et al.
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY (2011)
A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent DNA binding
S. J. Enoch et al.
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY (2010)
The Salmonella Mutagenicity Assay: The Stethoscope of Genetic Toxicology for the 21st Century
Larry D. Claxton et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES (2010)
Applicability Domains for Classification Problems: Benchmarking of Distance to Models for Ames Mutagenicity Set
Iurii Sushko et al.
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING (2010)
Benchmark Data Set for in Silico Prediction of Ames Mutagenicity
Katja Hansen et al.
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING (2009)
Calculation of Molecular Lipophilicity: State-of-the-Art and Comparison of Log P Methods on More Than 96,000 Compounds
Raimund Mannhold et al.
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES (2009)
Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity
Markus Kamber et al.
MUTAGENESIS (2009)
Structure alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system:: A novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology
Romualdo Benigni et al.
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH (2008)
Identification of the structural requirements for mutagencitiy, by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals. II. General Ames mutagenicity model
R. Serafimova et al.
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY (2007)
In silico assessment of chemical mutagenesis in comparison with results of Salmonella microsome assay on 909 chemicals
M Hayashi et al.
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS (2005)
Prediction of the rodent carcinogenicity of 60 pesticides by the DEREKfW expert system
P Crettaz et al.
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING (2005)
The problem of overfitting
DM Hawkins
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES (2004)
Identification of the structural requirements for mutagenicity by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals I: TA100 model
O Mekenyan et al.
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY (2004)
Application of associative neural networks for prediction of lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 program
IV Tetko et al.
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES (2002)
Prediction of n-octanol/water partition coefficients from PHYSPROP database using artificial neural networks and E-state indices
IV Tetko et al.
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES (2001)
The proportions of mutagens among chemicals in commerce
E Zeiger et al.
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2000)