4.2 Article

Inactivation of MS2 coliphage by UV and hydrogen peroxide: Comparison by cultural and molecular methodologies

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2014.854607

Keywords

UV disinfection; drinking water; qPCR; plaque assay; MS2 coliphage

Funding

  1. University of Arizona National Science Foundation Water and Environmental Technology Center
  2. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1361505, 0855786] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of advanced oxidation processes (AOP) are expected to increase for removal of emerging contaminants and pathogens from drinking water. In this study, the performance of a small community ultraviolet light reactor in combination with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for MS2 coliphage inactivation with two different flow rate conditions of 1 gal/min (gpm) and 2 gpm was evaluated. Following UV radiation, MS2 showed a reduction of 5.3-5.8 log(10) when quantified with cultural plaque counts, whereas corresponding quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) data showed only a 1.7-2.8 log(10) reduction in viral RNA copy number. When H2O2 was added at either 2.5 or 5ppm with UV at both flow rate conditions, enhanced MS2 inactivation occurred with a more than 7 log(10) reduction observed via plaque counts, indicating that all added MS2 had been inactivated, since no plaques were formed after incubation at 37 degrees C for 24h. In contrast, qPCR only showed a corresponding 3-4 log(10) reduction in viral RNA copy number. This research also sheds light on the inactivation of MS2 with ultraviolet light and in the presence of hydroxyl radicals and provides a practical use of qPCR to detect MS2 concentration following advanced oxidation relative to traditional plaque methodology; however qPCR detection overestimates the true number of infective virus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available