4.4 Article

Assessing radiation impact at a protected coastal sand dune site: an intercomparison of models for estimating the radiological exposure of non-human biota

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
Volume 100, Issue 12, Pages 1034-1052

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.04.010

Keywords

Sand dune; Sellafield; Low-level waste repository; Ionising radiation; Non-human species; ERICA; RESRAD-BIOTA; Risk assessment

Funding

  1. EC
  2. Environment Agency England
  3. Wales and English Nature
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010023] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the application of three publicly available biota dose assessment models (the ERICA Tool, R&D128/SP1a and RESRAD-BIOTA) to an assessment of the Drigg coastal sand dunes. Using measured Sr-90, Tc-99, Cs-137, Pu-238, Pu239+240 and Am-241 activity concentrations in sand dune soil, activity concentration and dose rate predictions are made for a range of organisms including amphibians, birds, invertebrates, mammals, reptiles, plants and fungi. Predicted biota activity concentrations are compared to measured data where available. The main source of variability in the model predictions is the transfer parameters used and it is concluded that developing the available transfer databases should be a focus of future research effort. The value of taking an informed user approach to investigate the way in which models may be expected to be applied in practice is highlighted and a strategy for the future development of intercomparison exercises is presented. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available