4.4 Article

Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Growth Reduction Caused by Hydrochar Is Related to Nitrogen Supply

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 1067-1075

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2011.0237

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DBU (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, Germany) [AZ 27436-35/0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrothermal carbonization allows rapid conversion of biomass into a carbon-rich, lignite-like product (hydrochar). It is assumed to have beneficial effects on soil properties and plant growth, but detailed studies are lacking, especially in the field. The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of hydrochar incorporated into arable soils on soil mineral nitrogen (N-min) content and sugar beet growth. In 2010-2011, a field and a pot trial were conducted. Hydrochars (field: 10 Mg ha(-1); pot: equivalent to 30 Mg ha(-1)) processed from sugar beet pulp (HSP) and beer draff (HBD) were tested against an untreated control. As a second factor, mineral nitrogen (N) fertilizer level (field: 0, 50, 100, 150 kg N ha(-1); pot: 0, 100, 200 mg N kg(-1) soil) was varied. In both trials, hydrochars reduced initial sugar beet growth, especially when hydrochar with a high C/N ratio (38, HSP) was combined with a low N fertilizer level; high N supply partly compensated for the reduced seedling growth. Without N fertilization, no extractable N-min was present at the end of the pot trial in the HSP treatment, whereas in HBD even more N-min was extracted than in the control. This suggests remineralization of previously immobilized N when hydrochar with a low C/N ratio was applied (16, HBD). In the field, beet yield was equal at the high N fertilizer level in HSP and at all N levels in HBD treatment. Our results suggest that hydrochar can decrease plant-available N due to N immobilization. Other potential causes for the observed early growth reduction need to be studied more in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available