4.7 Article

Co-treatment of landfill leachate and domestic wastewater using a submerged aerobic biofilter

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 9-15

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.022

Keywords

FTIR spectroscopy; Humic substances; India ink reverse stain; Municipal solid waste; Organic matter removal; Sanitary landfill leachate

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [2010/51955-2, 2011/50627-4]
  2. CNPq [303083/2010-7, 141710/2010-1]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [10/51955-2] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used a pilot-scale submerged aerobic biofilter (SAB) to evaluate the co-treatment of domestic wastewater and landfill leachate that was pre-treated by air stripping. The leachate tested volumetric ratios were 0, 2, and 5%. At a hydraulic retention time of 24 h, the SAB was best operated with a volumetric ratio of 2% and removed 98% of the biochemical oxygen demand (BUD), 80% of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and 90% of the total suspended solids (TSS). A proposed method, which we called the equivalent in humic acid (Eq.HA) approach, indicated that the hardly biodegradable organic matter in leachate was removed by partial degradation (71% of DOC Eq.HA removal). Adding leachate at a volumetric ratio of 5%, the concentration of the hardly biodegradable organic matter was decreased primarily as a result of dilution rather than biodegradation, which was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) was mostly removed (90%) by nitrification, and the SAB performances at the volumetric ratios of 0 and 2% were equal. For the three tested volumetric ratios of leachate (0, 2, and 5%), the concentrations of heavy metals in the treated samples were below the local limits. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available