4.7 Article

Motivating green public procurement in China: An individual level perspective

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 85-95

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.009

Keywords

Government green procurement; Empirical research; Moderation; Survey; Green purchasing; Policy; China

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [71025002]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB013406]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [71033004, 712111042]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2008-318]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology [2011BAJ06B01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Green public procurement (GPP) practices have been recognized as an effective policy tool for sustainable production and consumption. However, GPP practices adoption, especially in developing countries, is still an issue. Seeking to help understand these adoption issues, we develop a conceptual model which hypothesizes moderation effects of GPP knowledge on the relationships between GPP drivers and practices. Using primary data collected from 193 Chinese government officials, we find that regulations, rewards & incentive gains, and stakeholders exert pressure to motivate adoption of GPP practices. Knowledge of GPP regulations, responsibilities and experiences in developed countries is found to be limited. The study also found that voluntary regulations may actually be demotivating GPP practices. This study contributes to further theoretical and practical understanding of GPP practices. The findings can be helpful for policy makers, especially those in developing countries, to establish promotion and diffusion mechanisms for GPP practices as an important sustainable development tool. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available