4.7 Article

The role of uncertainty and subjective influences on consequence assessment by aquatic biosecurity experts

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 103-113

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.043

Keywords

Non-indigenous species; Uncertainty; Precaution; Expert decision making; Heuristic-Systematic Model; Consequence assessment; Biosecurity; Maximin

Funding

  1. Australian Maritime College (a specialist institute of the University of Tasmania)
  2. Australian Geographic Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expert judgement is often used to mitigate the knowledge gaps that limit understanding of aquatic non-indigenous species (ANS) impacts (consequences) to environmental, economic, social, cultural and human health values. To understand how this uncertainty may affect expert decision making, we explored the presence and effects of uncertainty on consequence assessment for 10 ANS by scientists and managers. We hypothesized species' distribution, taxonomy and impact type will affect assessment magnitude. These hypotheses were partially supported. We also hypothesized a difference in the relationship between consequence magnitude and uncertainty, based on assessor group. This set of hypotheses was not supported, as all group assessments had a significant negative correlation between consequence and uncertainty. Both scientists and managers assigned lower consequence when faced with knowledge gaps and other forms of uncertainty. This aligns with an innocent until proven guilty or hindsight approach, as opposed to a guilty until proven innocent or precaution approach. Based on these outcomes, the experts appeared to make decisions in violation of both the maximin principle and precaution, instead using a heuristic approach. We suggest several management strategies to prevent biases against environmental protection that occur due to use of the hindsight approach. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available