4.7 Article

Comparison of two adsorbents for the removal of pentavalent arsenic from aqueous solutions

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 98, Issue -, Pages 98-106

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.018

Keywords

Magnesia-loaded fly ash cenospheres; Manganese-loaded fly ash cenospheres; Fly ash cenospheres; Adsorption; Arsenic removal

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51008154]
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [SBK201022682]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090091120007]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [1112021101]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Nanjing University [2010CL07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two adsorbents, magnesia-loaded fly ash cenospheres (MGLC) and manganese-loaded fly ash cenospheres (MNLC), were prepared by wet impregnation of fly ash cenospheres with MgCl2 solution or a mixed solution of MnCl2 and KMnO4, respectively. Their physicochemical properties were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffractometry, X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, and Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. Sorption experiments were conducted to examine the effects of adsorbent dosage, pH, time, temperature, ionic strength and competing anions on As(V) removal by MGLC and MNLC. Both MGLC and MNLC had greater pH buffering capacity and were less affected by changes in ionic strength. Competing anions (carbonate and dihydric phosphate) had a larger impact on As(V) removal by MNLC than by MGLC. Adsorption on MNLC reached equilibrium at 60 min, while adsorption on MGLC reached equilibrium at 120 min. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm was a good fit for the experimental data of As(V) adsorption on MGLC and MNLC, and the adsorption kinetics for both followed the pseudo-second-order rate equation. MGLC and MNLC had a larger removal capacity for As(V) than the cenospheres. Compared with MNLC, MGLC is a better absorbent. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available