4.7 Article

Evaluation of Fenton and ozone-based advanced oxidation processes as mature landfill leachate pre-treatments

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 749-755

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.035

Keywords

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs); Biodegradability; Fenton treatment; Mature landfill leachate; Ozonation

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [SFRH/BD/24715/2005, SFRH/BPD/26803/2006]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/24715/2005] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fenton treatment (Fe2+/H2O2) and different ozone-based Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOP5) (O-3, O-3/OH- and O-3/H2O2) were evaluated as pre-treatment of a mature landfill leachate, in order to improve the biodegradability of its recalcitrant organic matter for subsequent biological treatment. With a two-fold diluted leachate, at optimised experimental conditions (initial pH 3, H2O2 to Fe2+ molar ratio of 3, Fe2+ dosage of 4 mmol L-1, and reaction time of 40 min) Fenton treatment removed about 46% of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and increased the five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) to COD ratio (BOD5/COD) from 0.01 to 0.15. The highest removal efficiency and biodegradability was achieved by ozone at higher pH values, solely or combined with H2O2. These results confirm the enhanced production of hydroxyl radical under such conditions. After the application for 60 min of ozone at 5.6 g O-3 h(-1), initial pH 7, and 400 mg L-1 of hydrogen peroxide, COD removal efficiency was 72% and BOD5/COD increased from 0.01 to 0.24. An estimation of the operating costs of the AOPs processes investigated revealed that Fe2+/H2O2 was the most economical system (8.2 (sic) m(-3) g(-1) of COD removed) to treat the landfill leachate. This economic study, however, should be treated with caution since it does not consider the initial investment, prices at plant scale, maintenance and labour costs. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available