4.7 Article

Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation and the performance implications

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages 1324-1331

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.013

Keywords

Environmental-oriented supply chain; cooperation; Chinese manufacturers; Circular economy; Empirical study; Performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [70772085]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University in China [NCET-09-0082]
  3. NSFC-JSPS [70911140101]
  4. Chinese Academy of Science [2008-318]
  5. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [GRF PolyU 5440/09H]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapidly growing industrial activities in emerging economies such as China have been causing resource depletion and pollution problems. This reality requires China to adopt an integrated management approach to resolve the conflict between industrial development and environmental protection, and the concept of circular economy (CE) serves this purpose. In this paper, we examine if different types of manufacturing enterprises on environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation (ESCC) exist. We also determine if the Chinese manufacturer types varying in ESCC differ in their implementation of the CE practices towards achieving the CE-targeted goals on improving both environmental and economic performance. Our cluster analytic results with multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) among the four identified types of Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation highlight the importance to intensify the cooperation with upstream and downstream supply chain partners for a CE initiative to succeed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available