Journal
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 90, Issue 7, Pages 2219-2225Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.021
Keywords
Water turbidity; Water depth; Marshland; Remote sensing; Wetlands; GAM; GLM
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We have used Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ images together with simultaneous ground-truth data at sample points in the Donana marshes to predict water turbidity and depth from band reflectance using Generalized Additive Models. We have point samples for 12 different dates simultaneous with 7 Landsat-5 and 5 Landsat-7 overpasses. The best model for water turbidity in the marsh explained 38% of variance in ground-troth data and included as predictors band 3 (630-690 nm). band 5 (1550-1750 nm) and the ratio between bands 1 (450-520 nm) and 4 (760-900 nm). Water turbidity is easier to predict for water bodies like the Guadalquivir River and artificial ponds that are deep anti not affected by bottom soil reflectance and aquatic vegetation. For the latter, a simple model using hand 3 reflectance explains 78.6% of the variance. Water depth is easier to predict than turbidity. The best model for water depth in the marsh explains 78% of the variance and includes as predictors band 1, band 5, the ratio between band 2 (520-600 nm) and band 4. and bottom soil reflectance in band 4 in September. when the marsh is dry. The water turbidity and water depth models have been developed in order to reconstruct historical changes in Donana wetlands during the last 30 years using the Landsat satellite images time series. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available